Search for: "Tate v. True" Results 1 - 20 of 66
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2023, 2:23 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
It is true that a person cannot complain of nuisance because their flat is overlooked by another building or because people on the top floor of that building can look into their homes and see inside. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 6:48 am
Therefore, I don't believe they're true threats or implied threats.State v. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 8:09 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Cir. 2008) (quoting Tate, 279 F.3d at 1367). [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 5:18 pm
See, e.g., Tate Access Floors, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 9:39 am
By Michael Kiely and Phillip Tate True to their promise, the California Redevelopment Association, or CRA, and the California League of Cities, or CLC, petitioned the California Supreme Court on July 15, 2011 for a writ of mandate challenging the Legislature's adoption of ABX1 26, providing for elimination of California redevelopment agencies (RDAs), and ABX1 27, exempting from elimination any RDA that agrees to make its share of a $1.7 billion voluntary contribution of its… [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 9:39 am
By Michael Kiely and Phillip Tate True to their promise, the California Redevelopment Association, or CRA, and the California League of Cities, or CLC, petitioned the California Supreme Court on July 15, 2011 for a writ of mandate challenging the Legislature's adoption of ABX1 26, providing for elimination of California redevelopment agencies (RDAs), and ABX1 27, exempting from elimination any RDA that agrees to make its share of a $1.7 billion voluntary contribution of its… [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 7:08 am by Roy Black
No Island of Sanity: Paula Jones v. [read post]